Cloud-native infinite canvas with multi-model support vs open-source local node system. A detailed comparison to help you choose the right AI video workflow.
Cloud-native node-based infinite canvas for AI video production
Open-source node-based AI application for local generation
Side-by-side breakdown of key capabilities
| Feature | Martini Art | ComfyUI |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | ☁️ Cloud-native (browser) | 💻 Self-hosted (local machine) |
| GPU Required | No | Yes (NVIDIA / AMD) |
| Node System | Advanced (video-optimized) | Advanced (extensible plugins) |
| Multi-Model Support | Built-in: Veo, Kling, Runway, etc. | Manual integration required |
| Real-time Collaboration | ✓ Figma-like multiplayer | ✗ Single-user only |
| Infinite Canvas | ✓ True infinite canvas | ~ Standard node layout |
| Virtual Camera | Full 3D camera system | Limited |
| Professional Export | XML → Premiere / DaVinci / FCP | Raw files, custom pipelines |
| Setup Time | Minutes | Hours (drivers, deps, models) |
| 3D Generation | Coming soon | ✓ Blender integration |
| Offline Usage | Requires internet | ✓ Fully offline capable |
| Open Source | No | ✓ GPL-3.0 |
| Custom Nodes | Production-ready set | Unlimited community plugins |
| Cost | Free tier + paid plans ($20–$150/mo) | Free (+ GPU hardware costs) |
How each tool handles key workflows differently
Production-ready nodes optimized for video: chain AI models, add transitions, control cameras, and export to professional editors — all in a visual, shareable canvas. Workflows are collaborative by default.
Unmatched extensibility through a massive community plugin ecosystem. Control every model parameter. Workflows are stored as JSON for sharing, but require technical setup and run on your local machine only.
Officially integrates closed-source frontier models (Veo, Kling, Runway Gen-4) with one-click access. No API key management. Test different models per shot and compare results on the same canvas.
Supports virtually any downloadable model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Hunyuan-DiT, Civitai). Requires manual download, placement, and dependency management. Powerful but infrastructure-heavy.
Real-time multiplayer editing — like Figma for video. Multiple team members work on the same infinite canvas simultaneously. Changes sync instantly with version history.
Single-user by design. To share work, export JSON workflows and send to teammates. No real-time sync. Comfy Cloud is in beta but doesn't yet offer multiplayer editing.
Native XML export to Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, and Final Cut Pro. Professional editors receive sequences with effects, transitions, timing, and metadata intact. No manual reassembly.
Outputs raw images, video frames, and 3D assets. Integration with professional NLEs requires custom Python scripts or manual file organization. Powerful for pipelines, but not plug-and-play.
Understanding the true cost of each platform
For casual to mid-volume users, Martini Art is typically more cost-effective. For high-volume studios with existing GPU infrastructure, ComfyUI's self-hosted model may have lower marginal costs.
Depends on your team, workflow, and priorities
Common questions about Martini Art vs ComfyUI